Author Archives: Anonymous

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:51:00

Ankit
  • Week 3 – 7 October

Cross-browser Web testing tools

At this thime, there is a huge collection of competing browsers. In this situation, there are no common standards for displaying sites: each one of them may display a site in its own way, for example, by distorting the page content. Due to this fact, the “cross-browser” term emerged, that is the feature of a site to be displayed identically in all browsers.Although the cross-browser issue emerged rather recently, there already exist a great number of tools for testing it.All cross-browser testing tools are different  in the number of supported browsers, ease to use, price, and also testing speed. These factors greatly complicate the choice of the suitable tool.This article is devoted to the problem of choosing the right cross-browser testing tool. It lists the popular tools, their advantages and disadvantages.This article would be useful for testers, who haven’t performed this kind of testing yet, or for people, who face the problem of choosing the suitable tool.BrowserShots gives the possibility to test a site not only in five most popular browsers, but also in less known browsers, such as Netscape, Avant, SeaMonkey.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Ultra Code 2016-10-25 10:34:00

Ankit Gupta
  • Week 2 – 30 September

Analysis of Connection of Options and Input/output Data

It is best to analyze all options in sequence for this purpose. We need to determine the following for each option: what input data it is required for, where it is used, and what types of reports it affects. Common options that depend neither on input data, nor on output data;Input and output data options, which include options that depend on input data and affect final result. For example: The Properties of the included data group of options: a user selects the properties of email messages to be included to a report. I.e. these options affect the final result and depend on input data. In theory, to cover these options completely, we would require to generate all types of reports for each type of database with each option separately. We would also require testing of all possible combinations of options. But first, we need to analyze the influence of input data on each option. As we did earlier, we need to study the inner architecture of the system and discuss the specifics of the inner architecture with developers. This would allow us to determine if we need to test each option with all types of email databases or if testing with one type would be enough. The algorithms for reading the properties from databases are the same for all three types of databases in our example. Thanks to this, we can test options only with one type of database. In much the same way, after studying the inner structure of the system, we determine the degree of dependency of each option on the type of report. In our case, the algorithms for writing each property to a report are the same for all formats of reports, i.e. it is enough to generate one type of report for one type of email database for each option.

From the blog Ultra Code by Anonymous and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.