Author Archives: Camille

Sprint #2 Retrospective

Hello!

It’s that time of the month again, we’ve just finished up sprint number 2, and now I’ve got to write about how it went! 

I think this sprint was considerably more productive than the last one (even if I still couldn’t get my assigned issue done). I managed to parse out how I am going to make timestamps for the rabbitMQ messages, and I did a significant amount of testing with some files, to the point where I basically had everything working by the end of sprint 2. It would have been implemented were it not for the fact that I ran into some last minute errors that I couldn’t get fixed in time. Like the last post I made, the merge request will be available at the bottom of the post.

I think I did a much better job at communicating with my group this time around. I think I was a little shy before, plus overwhelmed at having to learn a new skill and be a productive member of a group. Now though, I’ve been pretty consistently talking to my group about what I’m working on, and I’ve been asking questions on things that trip me up, which I would consider a wild improvement over last time.

 In terms of things that didn’t go so well, I could do with some better time management skills. If I had planned out my work a bit better, I probably would have had ample time to fix the errors I was getting, and I might even have been able to implement everything I had been working on. I’m not going to fret about that though, I just have to keep that in mind and make sure I give this sprint all the time it needs from me to get everything done. 

As with myself, our group has been doing a lot more communicating lately. Most of it has been really good, but a good chunk of it has not been very on topic. I’m not about to be some kind of narc that wants every minute of every day be spent working, that sounds utterly miserable, but I would like more of our discussions being related to what we are working on.

After looking in the book, I think the apprenticeship pattern that relates the most to this sprint was “Expose Your Ignorance”. The pattern states that the best way to fill gaps in my knowledge is to reveal them to my group, so that I might be more encouraged to find what I am missing. I’ve been the one working on rabbitMQ for two sprints now, and as such, I think it is easy to assume that I know every aspect of what it going on, but the longer I work on this project, the more small problems seem to come out of the woodwork. Oh sure, we have the code needed to send messages, but there is no queue for them to go into, so what is the point, etc. So, had I read this pattern at the start of the sprint, I think it would have been more productive to know what kind of stuff I was missing, so I can avoid any unexpected problems. I would have laid out the plan for the sprint, done some research on everything I was doing if I wasn’t 100% solid on it, and had some better fundamental knowledge going into that sprint than what I had. 

As usual, I will try to keep the things I learned in mind, but I will continue working on my issue, knowing that I do not have all the knowledge I need, and being willing to ask for help in finding it.

 

 

Merge request: https://gitlab.com/LibreFoodPantry/client-solutions/theas-pantry/inventorysystem-weight-based/inventorybackend/-/merge_requests/65

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Sprint #2 Retrospective

Hello!

It’s that time of the month again, we’ve just finished up sprint number 2, and now I’ve got to write about how it went! 

I think this sprint was considerably more productive than the last one (even if I still couldn’t get my assigned issue done). I managed to parse out how I am going to make timestamps for the rabbitMQ messages, and I did a significant amount of testing with some files, to the point where I basically had everything working by the end of sprint 2. It would have been implemented were it not for the fact that I ran into some last minute errors that I couldn’t get fixed in time. Like the last post I made, the merge request will be available at the bottom of the post.

I think I did a much better job at communicating with my group this time around. I think I was a little shy before, plus overwhelmed at having to learn a new skill and be a productive member of a group. Now though, I’ve been pretty consistently talking to my group about what I’m working on, and I’ve been asking questions on things that trip me up, which I would consider a wild improvement over last time.

 In terms of things that didn’t go so well, I could do with some better time management skills. If I had planned out my work a bit better, I probably would have had ample time to fix the errors I was getting, and I might even have been able to implement everything I had been working on. I’m not going to fret about that though, I just have to keep that in mind and make sure I give this sprint all the time it needs from me to get everything done. 

As with myself, our group has been doing a lot more communicating lately. Most of it has been really good, but a good chunk of it has not been very on topic. I’m not about to be some kind of narc that wants every minute of every day be spent working, that sounds utterly miserable, but I would like more of our discussions being related to what we are working on.

After looking in the book, I think the apprenticeship pattern that relates the most to this sprint was “Expose Your Ignorance”. The pattern states that the best way to fill gaps in my knowledge is to reveal them to my group, so that I might be more encouraged to find what I am missing. I’ve been the one working on rabbitMQ for two sprints now, and as such, I think it is easy to assume that I know every aspect of what it going on, but the longer I work on this project, the more small problems seem to come out of the woodwork. Oh sure, we have the code needed to send messages, but there is no queue for them to go into, so what is the point, etc. So, had I read this pattern at the start of the sprint, I think it would have been more productive to know what kind of stuff I was missing, so I can avoid any unexpected problems. I would have laid out the plan for the sprint, done some research on everything I was doing if I wasn’t 100% solid on it, and had some better fundamental knowledge going into that sprint than what I had. 

As usual, I will try to keep the things I learned in mind, but I will continue working on my issue, knowing that I do not have all the knowledge I need, and being willing to ask for help in finding it.

 

 

Merge request: https://gitlab.com/LibreFoodPantry/client-solutions/theas-pantry/inventorysystem-weight-based/inventorybackend/-/merge_requests/65

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Sprint #2 Retrospective

Hello!

It’s that time of the month again, we’ve just finished up sprint number 2, and now I’ve got to write about how it went! 

I think this sprint was considerably more productive than the last one (even if I still couldn’t get my assigned issue done). I managed to parse out how I am going to make timestamps for the rabbitMQ messages, and I did a significant amount of testing with some files, to the point where I basically had everything working by the end of sprint 2. It would have been implemented were it not for the fact that I ran into some last minute errors that I couldn’t get fixed in time. Like the last post I made, the merge request will be available at the bottom of the post.

I think I did a much better job at communicating with my group this time around. I think I was a little shy before, plus overwhelmed at having to learn a new skill and be a productive member of a group. Now though, I’ve been pretty consistently talking to my group about what I’m working on, and I’ve been asking questions on things that trip me up, which I would consider a wild improvement over last time.

 In terms of things that didn’t go so well, I could do with some better time management skills. If I had planned out my work a bit better, I probably would have had ample time to fix the errors I was getting, and I might even have been able to implement everything I had been working on. I’m not going to fret about that though, I just have to keep that in mind and make sure I give this sprint all the time it needs from me to get everything done. 

As with myself, our group has been doing a lot more communicating lately. Most of it has been really good, but a good chunk of it has not been very on topic. I’m not about to be some kind of narc that wants every minute of every day be spent working, that sounds utterly miserable, but I would like more of our discussions being related to what we are working on.

After looking in the book, I think the apprenticeship pattern that relates the most to this sprint was “Expose Your Ignorance”. The pattern states that the best way to fill gaps in my knowledge is to reveal them to my group, so that I might be more encouraged to find what I am missing. I’ve been the one working on rabbitMQ for two sprints now, and as such, I think it is easy to assume that I know every aspect of what it going on, but the longer I work on this project, the more small problems seem to come out of the woodwork. Oh sure, we have the code needed to send messages, but there is no queue for them to go into, so what is the point, etc. So, had I read this pattern at the start of the sprint, I think it would have been more productive to know what kind of stuff I was missing, so I can avoid any unexpected problems. I would have laid out the plan for the sprint, done some research on everything I was doing if I wasn’t 100% solid on it, and had some better fundamental knowledge going into that sprint than what I had. 

As usual, I will try to keep the things I learned in mind, but I will continue working on my issue, knowing that I do not have all the knowledge I need, and being willing to ask for help in finding it.

 

 

Merge request: https://gitlab.com/LibreFoodPantry/client-solutions/theas-pantry/inventorysystem-weight-based/inventorybackend/-/merge_requests/65

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Sprint #2 Retrospective

Hello!

It’s that time of the month again, we’ve just finished up sprint number 2, and now I’ve got to write about how it went! 

I think this sprint was considerably more productive than the last one (even if I still couldn’t get my assigned issue done). I managed to parse out how I am going to make timestamps for the rabbitMQ messages, and I did a significant amount of testing with some files, to the point where I basically had everything working by the end of sprint 2. It would have been implemented were it not for the fact that I ran into some last minute errors that I couldn’t get fixed in time. Like the last post I made, the merge request will be available at the bottom of the post.

I think I did a much better job at communicating with my group this time around. I think I was a little shy before, plus overwhelmed at having to learn a new skill and be a productive member of a group. Now though, I’ve been pretty consistently talking to my group about what I’m working on, and I’ve been asking questions on things that trip me up, which I would consider a wild improvement over last time.

 In terms of things that didn’t go so well, I could do with some better time management skills. If I had planned out my work a bit better, I probably would have had ample time to fix the errors I was getting, and I might even have been able to implement everything I had been working on. I’m not going to fret about that though, I just have to keep that in mind and make sure I give this sprint all the time it needs from me to get everything done. 

As with myself, our group has been doing a lot more communicating lately. Most of it has been really good, but a good chunk of it has not been very on topic. I’m not about to be some kind of narc that wants every minute of every day be spent working, that sounds utterly miserable, but I would like more of our discussions being related to what we are working on.

After looking in the book, I think the apprenticeship pattern that relates the most to this sprint was “Expose Your Ignorance”. The pattern states that the best way to fill gaps in my knowledge is to reveal them to my group, so that I might be more encouraged to find what I am missing. I’ve been the one working on rabbitMQ for two sprints now, and as such, I think it is easy to assume that I know every aspect of what it going on, but the longer I work on this project, the more small problems seem to come out of the woodwork. Oh sure, we have the code needed to send messages, but there is no queue for them to go into, so what is the point, etc. So, had I read this pattern at the start of the sprint, I think it would have been more productive to know what kind of stuff I was missing, so I can avoid any unexpected problems. I would have laid out the plan for the sprint, done some research on everything I was doing if I wasn’t 100% solid on it, and had some better fundamental knowledge going into that sprint than what I had. 

As usual, I will try to keep the things I learned in mind, but I will continue working on my issue, knowing that I do not have all the knowledge I need, and being willing to ask for help in finding it.

 

 

Merge request: https://gitlab.com/LibreFoodPantry/client-solutions/theas-pantry/inventorysystem-weight-based/inventorybackend/-/merge_requests/65

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Sprint #2 Retrospective

Hello!

It’s that time of the month again, we’ve just finished up sprint number 2, and now I’ve got to write about how it went! 

I think this sprint was considerably more productive than the last one (even if I still couldn’t get my assigned issue done). I managed to parse out how I am going to make timestamps for the rabbitMQ messages, and I did a significant amount of testing with some files, to the point where I basically had everything working by the end of sprint 2. It would have been implemented were it not for the fact that I ran into some last minute errors that I couldn’t get fixed in time. Like the last post I made, the merge request will be available at the bottom of the post.

I think I did a much better job at communicating with my group this time around. I think I was a little shy before, plus overwhelmed at having to learn a new skill and be a productive member of a group. Now though, I’ve been pretty consistently talking to my group about what I’m working on, and I’ve been asking questions on things that trip me up, which I would consider a wild improvement over last time.

 In terms of things that didn’t go so well, I could do with some better time management skills. If I had planned out my work a bit better, I probably would have had ample time to fix the errors I was getting, and I might even have been able to implement everything I had been working on. I’m not going to fret about that though, I just have to keep that in mind and make sure I give this sprint all the time it needs from me to get everything done. 

As with myself, our group has been doing a lot more communicating lately. Most of it has been really good, but a good chunk of it has not been very on topic. I’m not about to be some kind of narc that wants every minute of every day be spent working, that sounds utterly miserable, but I would like more of our discussions being related to what we are working on.

After looking in the book, I think the apprenticeship pattern that relates the most to this sprint was “Expose Your Ignorance”. The pattern states that the best way to fill gaps in my knowledge is to reveal them to my group, so that I might be more encouraged to find what I am missing. I’ve been the one working on rabbitMQ for two sprints now, and as such, I think it is easy to assume that I know every aspect of what it going on, but the longer I work on this project, the more small problems seem to come out of the woodwork. Oh sure, we have the code needed to send messages, but there is no queue for them to go into, so what is the point, etc. So, had I read this pattern at the start of the sprint, I think it would have been more productive to know what kind of stuff I was missing, so I can avoid any unexpected problems. I would have laid out the plan for the sprint, done some research on everything I was doing if I wasn’t 100% solid on it, and had some better fundamental knowledge going into that sprint than what I had. 

As usual, I will try to keep the things I learned in mind, but I will continue working on my issue, knowing that I do not have all the knowledge I need, and being willing to ask for help in finding it.

 

 

Merge request: https://gitlab.com/LibreFoodPantry/client-solutions/theas-pantry/inventorysystem-weight-based/inventorybackend/-/merge_requests/65

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Testing and Testing (One of them is a Fake).

 Hello!

This week in class we’ve been discussing testing using fakes, more specifically with Stubs. Our first assignment this week told us about the different kinds of fakes used in testing, which I found a little confusing at first, since I would have liked to have seen a more literal example of all the different variants. That is why, for the sake of improving my knowledge on the subject going forward, since this is something we’ll be talking about, I decided to do some reading on stubs and mocks, from a blog post written by Raphael F. on Medium. 

The article spoke at length about the differences between mocks and stubs, and gave some meaningful examples of both. I appreciated the use of diagrams in the article, as it shows what each of them interacts with and how (i.e. A stub doesn’t interact with a database, and is instead a hard-coded value to be grabbed for testing). That wasn’t something that was immediately obvious to me in the assignments, and during our assignment on Stubs specifically it began to make more sense, but I appreciate the way the article laid out the concept in plain text, and made it easier to understand. I also liked that the blog post went over real world applications for each of the fake types, such a using stubs for read/write actions to keep the code and files separate, or using mocks for API testing. Admittedly I am still a little hazy on mocks, but I think by the time we go over it in class, it will all make sense.

 In closing, I really do value stubs as valuable pieces of testing equipment, since they allow me to test code without having to have every intricate detail finished. It makes sense for confirming methods got used, and that a specific path through the program is being followed. Stubs can’t do everything, you can’t really test complex operations on a piece of code that doesn’t work, but for basic probing and testing, I could see myself using stubs a lot more often. It feels like one of those things that I could have used before without thinking about it, which makes sense, as I am the kind of programmer who likes taking things one step at a time, and making sure one piece works before moving on to the next. But now that I have a name connected to the action, I really appreciate it as a tool that will play a big role in my programming career going forward.

 

 Link to the blog post in question: https://medium.com/@fideraphael/a-comprehensive-guide-to-stub-and-mock-testing-unveiling-the-essence-of-effective-software-testing-7f7817e3eab4

 

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Testing and Testing (One of them is a Fake).

 Hello!

This week in class we’ve been discussing testing using fakes, more specifically with Stubs. Our first assignment this week told us about the different kinds of fakes used in testing, which I found a little confusing at first, since I would have liked to have seen a more literal example of all the different variants. That is why, for the sake of improving my knowledge on the subject going forward, since this is something we’ll be talking about, I decided to do some reading on stubs and mocks, from a blog post written by Raphael F. on Medium. 

The article spoke at length about the differences between mocks and stubs, and gave some meaningful examples of both. I appreciated the use of diagrams in the article, as it shows what each of them interacts with and how (i.e. A stub doesn’t interact with a database, and is instead a hard-coded value to be grabbed for testing). That wasn’t something that was immediately obvious to me in the assignments, and during our assignment on Stubs specifically it began to make more sense, but I appreciate the way the article laid out the concept in plain text, and made it easier to understand. I also liked that the blog post went over real world applications for each of the fake types, such a using stubs for read/write actions to keep the code and files separate, or using mocks for API testing. Admittedly I am still a little hazy on mocks, but I think by the time we go over it in class, it will all make sense.

 In closing, I really do value stubs as valuable pieces of testing equipment, since they allow me to test code without having to have every intricate detail finished. It makes sense for confirming methods got used, and that a specific path through the program is being followed. Stubs can’t do everything, you can’t really test complex operations on a piece of code that doesn’t work, but for basic probing and testing, I could see myself using stubs a lot more often. It feels like one of those things that I could have used before without thinking about it, which makes sense, as I am the kind of programmer who likes taking things one step at a time, and making sure one piece works before moving on to the next. But now that I have a name connected to the action, I really appreciate it as a tool that will play a big role in my programming career going forward.

 

 Link to the blog post in question: https://medium.com/@fideraphael/a-comprehensive-guide-to-stub-and-mock-testing-unveiling-the-essence-of-effective-software-testing-7f7817e3eab4

 

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Testing and Testing (One of them is a Fake).

 Hello!

This week in class we’ve been discussing testing using fakes, more specifically with Stubs. Our first assignment this week told us about the different kinds of fakes used in testing, which I found a little confusing at first, since I would have liked to have seen a more literal example of all the different variants. That is why, for the sake of improving my knowledge on the subject going forward, since this is something we’ll be talking about, I decided to do some reading on stubs and mocks, from a blog post written by Raphael F. on Medium. 

The article spoke at length about the differences between mocks and stubs, and gave some meaningful examples of both. I appreciated the use of diagrams in the article, as it shows what each of them interacts with and how (i.e. A stub doesn’t interact with a database, and is instead a hard-coded value to be grabbed for testing). That wasn’t something that was immediately obvious to me in the assignments, and during our assignment on Stubs specifically it began to make more sense, but I appreciate the way the article laid out the concept in plain text, and made it easier to understand. I also liked that the blog post went over real world applications for each of the fake types, such a using stubs for read/write actions to keep the code and files separate, or using mocks for API testing. Admittedly I am still a little hazy on mocks, but I think by the time we go over it in class, it will all make sense.

 In closing, I really do value stubs as valuable pieces of testing equipment, since they allow me to test code without having to have every intricate detail finished. It makes sense for confirming methods got used, and that a specific path through the program is being followed. Stubs can’t do everything, you can’t really test complex operations on a piece of code that doesn’t work, but for basic probing and testing, I could see myself using stubs a lot more often. It feels like one of those things that I could have used before without thinking about it, which makes sense, as I am the kind of programmer who likes taking things one step at a time, and making sure one piece works before moving on to the next. But now that I have a name connected to the action, I really appreciate it as a tool that will play a big role in my programming career going forward.

 

 Link to the blog post in question: https://medium.com/@fideraphael/a-comprehensive-guide-to-stub-and-mock-testing-unveiling-the-essence-of-effective-software-testing-7f7817e3eab4

 

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Testing and Testing (One of them is a Fake).

 Hello!

This week in class we’ve been discussing testing using fakes, more specifically with Stubs. Our first assignment this week told us about the different kinds of fakes used in testing, which I found a little confusing at first, since I would have liked to have seen a more literal example of all the different variants. That is why, for the sake of improving my knowledge on the subject going forward, since this is something we’ll be talking about, I decided to do some reading on stubs and mocks, from a blog post written by Raphael F. on Medium. 

The article spoke at length about the differences between mocks and stubs, and gave some meaningful examples of both. I appreciated the use of diagrams in the article, as it shows what each of them interacts with and how (i.e. A stub doesn’t interact with a database, and is instead a hard-coded value to be grabbed for testing). That wasn’t something that was immediately obvious to me in the assignments, and during our assignment on Stubs specifically it began to make more sense, but I appreciate the way the article laid out the concept in plain text, and made it easier to understand. I also liked that the blog post went over real world applications for each of the fake types, such a using stubs for read/write actions to keep the code and files separate, or using mocks for API testing. Admittedly I am still a little hazy on mocks, but I think by the time we go over it in class, it will all make sense.

 In closing, I really do value stubs as valuable pieces of testing equipment, since they allow me to test code without having to have every intricate detail finished. It makes sense for confirming methods got used, and that a specific path through the program is being followed. Stubs can’t do everything, you can’t really test complex operations on a piece of code that doesn’t work, but for basic probing and testing, I could see myself using stubs a lot more often. It feels like one of those things that I could have used before without thinking about it, which makes sense, as I am the kind of programmer who likes taking things one step at a time, and making sure one piece works before moving on to the next. But now that I have a name connected to the action, I really appreciate it as a tool that will play a big role in my programming career going forward.

 

 Link to the blog post in question: https://medium.com/@fideraphael/a-comprehensive-guide-to-stub-and-mock-testing-unveiling-the-essence-of-effective-software-testing-7f7817e3eab4

 

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Testing and Testing (One of them is a Fake).

 Hello!

This week in class we’ve been discussing testing using fakes, more specifically with Stubs. Our first assignment this week told us about the different kinds of fakes used in testing, which I found a little confusing at first, since I would have liked to have seen a more literal example of all the different variants. That is why, for the sake of improving my knowledge on the subject going forward, since this is something we’ll be talking about, I decided to do some reading on stubs and mocks, from a blog post written by Raphael F. on Medium. 

The article spoke at length about the differences between mocks and stubs, and gave some meaningful examples of both. I appreciated the use of diagrams in the article, as it shows what each of them interacts with and how (i.e. A stub doesn’t interact with a database, and is instead a hard-coded value to be grabbed for testing). That wasn’t something that was immediately obvious to me in the assignments, and during our assignment on Stubs specifically it began to make more sense, but I appreciate the way the article laid out the concept in plain text, and made it easier to understand. I also liked that the blog post went over real world applications for each of the fake types, such a using stubs for read/write actions to keep the code and files separate, or using mocks for API testing. Admittedly I am still a little hazy on mocks, but I think by the time we go over it in class, it will all make sense.

 In closing, I really do value stubs as valuable pieces of testing equipment, since they allow me to test code without having to have every intricate detail finished. It makes sense for confirming methods got used, and that a specific path through the program is being followed. Stubs can’t do everything, you can’t really test complex operations on a piece of code that doesn’t work, but for basic probing and testing, I could see myself using stubs a lot more often. It feels like one of those things that I could have used before without thinking about it, which makes sense, as I am the kind of programmer who likes taking things one step at a time, and making sure one piece works before moving on to the next. But now that I have a name connected to the action, I really appreciate it as a tool that will play a big role in my programming career going forward.

 

 Link to the blog post in question: https://medium.com/@fideraphael/a-comprehensive-guide-to-stub-and-mock-testing-unveiling-the-essence-of-effective-software-testing-7f7817e3eab4

 

 

From the blog Camille's Cluttered Closet by Camille and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.