Code reviews are a vital step in the process of putting out not only software but any form of work. This blog post by Kimmo Brunfeldt outlines the need for code reviews on projects as well as some of the best practices for them. The role of a code review is to share knowledge and ownership about the project among the team members as well as discuss development and do overall quality control. A standard flow can be seen as a draft, submission for review and suggested changes (A cycle between these steps often occurs), and then final approval and merging. Keeping this flow with positive feedback and clear and constant communication is key to consistent and good review.
The reasoning for choosing this topic was due to the recent topic of the class into the focus of clean code. This focus on clean code is a part of the process of code review as a key element of the review process as well as something to keep in mind during the writing of code. The ease of being able to not only read the code but how easy it is for someone else to understand it is vital for projects and a key aspect of code review. By having these group review sessions and collaborate with other people, it can help to have others look other the work and point out potential issues in naming or complexity.
The blog also gave some really great tips and ideas for me to use for future projects. Some of the best takeaways to implement were not only simple and obvious in hindsight, but ones that I myself often overlook in discussions and reviews of my work. The biggest thing I found to be key was keep constant code submissions small and concise so that quick review can be done and rapid feedback or implementation can be achieved. Along with this feedback should be given in a public setting or documented so that others can hear it or gain from it. These two statements were some the biggest takeaways that I found from the blog to apply to my own work as they are easy steps to take and implement in overall group work, however by doing these communication will not only increase across the entire project but also learning and overall scrutiny of the code in an easy manner that is not intrusive. Previous ways that I have seen or attempted include large sit downs or meets that often drag on but these seem to be much better alternatives that I look forward to trying.
Works Cited:
Brunfeldt, K. (2025, May 12). A complete guide to code reviews. Swarmiacom RSS. https://www.swarmia.com/blog/a-complete-guide-to-code-reviews/
From the blog CS@Worcester – Dan's Blog by Daniel Fung-A-Fat and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.
