I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I read Apprenticeship Patterns as per the syllabus and I found a lot of things that resonated deeply with me. Dave talks about giving up on learning to code, or rather to program after being unable to do anything compelling or significant, and only having had mastered Perl on his third attempt. I myself have on multiple occasions traded a language for another when I stop making progress. My thinking was – “Maybe, this isn’t the one for me”. So, I hopped from Python to JS to Scala to Java to C learning only the basics and just enough to satisfy any classes that might’ve required it. I was a jack of all trade, and master of none! Only upon revisiting Python again for a summer fellowship with a professor, and working on learning more than just the syntaxes, idiosyncrasies, and fun facts about the language, was I able to move on to being somewhat competent. Dave’s story tells us how he sought out mentors, took on challenging projects, and continuously challenged himself to improve and grow as a software developer. His story serves as an illustration of the apprenticeship journey and the importance of seeking out opportunities for learning and growth in the software development field.

I also really liked the definitions and the progression in stages – an apprentice, to a journeyman, to a master. Looking at software development as a craft to be honed and mastered like an Archer, or a Swordsman was quite interesting to think about. The third chapter especially was very enlightening. For the pursuit of efficiency, or most likely in service of sloth – my favorite sin, I take shortcuts whenever possible. I have noticed in myself the tendency to bodge things to make do – like putting on a band-aid over a bullet hole, to push perfection for later, to say – “Can’t be bolloxed, this will have to do!”.  Walking the Long Road is quite a departure from that mindset, and one I hope to grow into. Ah! to be able to rip off the band-aid!

All in all, quick fun read. Not bad at all!

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Technical debt is a programming theory that refers to the
necessary work that gets delayed during the development of a software project
to meet a deadline or deliverable. It is an idea that shortcuts are taken to
quickly deliver a product, but this decision incurs a “debt” that
must be paid in the future when the work is eventually completed. Technical
debt is often the result of a tradeoff between perfect products and the short
timelines often required for product delivery. Developers may choose the easier
route with messier code or design to deliver a product faster, but this can
lead to technical debt that must be addressed later.

Technical debt can accumulate “interest” over
time, increasing the difficulty of implementing changes and leading to software
entropy. It is important to manage technical debt to avoid these negative
consequences. This involves identifying technical debt, accounting for
nonfunctional requirements, and implementing best practices and agile practices
to minimize it. It is also important to be proactive in reducing technical debt
in new initiatives by carefully planning and designing projects from the start.

I selected this post because I wanted to learn more about
technical debt as I found the concept to be particularly interesting and
relevant to my future projects. This topic also seemed important as I found it
amazing that despite the large file structure for projects in this class, it
was not too difficult to add and update code for the assignments. That showed
me how a codebase can avoid technical debt to a degree, and how it simplifies
for maintainers (or a group of students) the process of adding and updating
code to the codebase. After reading through the blog, I gained a better
understanding of what technical debt is and how it can accumulate over time.
This really resonated with me as I can see how important it is to consider the
long-term implications of the decisions, we make during the development
process. One of the most valuable takeaways for me was learning about the various
types of technical debt and how to identify them. This will be especially
useful as I continue to learn and grow as a programmer. I also appreciated the
discussion of best practices and agile practices for managing technical debt,
as I can see how these approaches can help to minimize the amount of debt that
is incurred. I expect to apply what I learned in my future practice by being
more mindful of the potential impacts of my decisions and actively working to
minimize technical debt whenever possible.

Source:

https://www.bmc.com/blogs/technical-debt-explained-the-complete-guide-to-understanding-and-dealing-with-technical-debt/#

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Technical debt is a programming theory that refers to the
necessary work that gets delayed during the development of a software project
to meet a deadline or deliverable. It is an idea that shortcuts are taken to
quickly deliver a product, but this decision incurs a “debt” that
must be paid in the future when the work is eventually completed. Technical
debt is often the result of a tradeoff between perfect products and the short
timelines often required for product delivery. Developers may choose the easier
route with messier code or design to deliver a product faster, but this can
lead to technical debt that must be addressed later.

Technical debt can accumulate “interest” over
time, increasing the difficulty of implementing changes and leading to software
entropy. It is important to manage technical debt to avoid these negative
consequences. This involves identifying technical debt, accounting for
nonfunctional requirements, and implementing best practices and agile practices
to minimize it. It is also important to be proactive in reducing technical debt
in new initiatives by carefully planning and designing projects from the start.

I selected this post because I wanted to learn more about
technical debt as I found the concept to be particularly interesting and
relevant to my future projects. This topic also seemed important as I found it
amazing that despite the large file structure for projects in this class, it
was not too difficult to add and update code for the assignments. That showed
me how a codebase can avoid technical debt to a degree, and how it simplifies
for maintainers (or a group of students) the process of adding and updating
code to the codebase. After reading through the blog, I gained a better
understanding of what technical debt is and how it can accumulate over time.
This really resonated with me as I can see how important it is to consider the
long-term implications of the decisions, we make during the development
process. One of the most valuable takeaways for me was learning about the various
types of technical debt and how to identify them. This will be especially
useful as I continue to learn and grow as a programmer. I also appreciated the
discussion of best practices and agile practices for managing technical debt,
as I can see how these approaches can help to minimize the amount of debt that
is incurred. I expect to apply what I learned in my future practice by being
more mindful of the potential impacts of my decisions and actively working to
minimize technical debt whenever possible.

Source:

https://www.bmc.com/blogs/technical-debt-explained-the-complete-guide-to-understanding-and-dealing-with-technical-debt/#

From the blog Zed's Blog by Lord Zed and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.