Source:
https://www.browserstack.com/guide/static-testing-vs-dynamic-testing#:~:text=Static%20testing%20focuses%20on%20reviewing,to%20find%20bugs%20during%20runtime.&text=It%20is%20performed%20at%20the%20later%20stage%20of%20the%20software%20development.

This article is titled “Static vs Dynamic Testing” and explains the differences between them and how they allow for the development of quality software. Static testing is testing where the application isn’t being actively used. Code is manually read through to search for errors. As a result, a computer is not necessarily required for this form of testing as design documents containing the code can be reviewed. This kind of testing is done before the code is executed and early in the development process. The benefits to static testing are that defects are able to be found earlier in the process, it’s usually more cost-effective than other testing techniques, leads to more maintainable code, and encourages collaboration between team members. However some disadvantages of static testing are that not all of the issues could be found until the program/application actually runs, it depends on the experience of the reviewers for it to be effective, and it usually has to be done alongside dynamic testing to uncover other potential issues.

Dynamic testing involves giving an application input and analyzing the output. Code is being compiled in a run-time environment. This form of testing also relies on the expertise of the reviewers as deep knowledge of the system is required to understand how and why a system reacts based on the input. The advantages of dynamic testing are that runtime errors, memory leaks, and other issues that only come to fruition during code execution are revealed, helps verify that the software is working as intended by the developers, and ensures that all parts of the system work together appropriately. However some disadvantages of dynamic testing are that it can be time-consuming, may not cover all possible scenarios, and may be difficult to test uncommon instances in the program. 

Overall it is important to realize that static and dynamic testing are both important in their own ways and emphasize the importance of performing various kinds of testing methods to ensure an application works as intended. I chose this article because we discussed these topics in class and figured learning more about them would be beneficial. 

From the blog CS@Worcester – Shawn In Tech by Shawn Budzinski and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Beginning the reading of Apprenticeship Patterns: Guidance for the Aspiring Software Craftsman by Dave Hoover and Adewale Oshineye, I can say that I was expecting this book to be a lot more technical. However, the entirety of this reading was very thought-provoking. The idea of apprenticeship has always been interesting to me, and applying those principles in the modern era workforce of software development makes complete sense. Striving to continuously learn, receive guidance from your seniors, and actively indulge yourself in new technologies, will allow someone just starting their career to surely become the biggest fish in their pond, and ultimately cycle through the process of starting as the smallest fish and yet again becoming the biggest. This metaphor from the reading offers a vivid illustration of the importance of not becoming too complacent with your work and learning. Being the biggest fish in a small pond will not grant you any opportunity or growth, you have to surround yourself with individuals who are able to teach you something. Many people, including myself, have been led to believe that you should accept the highest paying job and quickly pursue roles in management. In reality the most meaningful aspect of the job is what you can learn from it, prioritizing this will pay off far greater than the short-term satisfaction of the high-paying job. The reading shifted my perspective from this cash grab mindset to a “knowledge grab” mindset. In regards to workflow on the job, the reading showcases the importance of utilizing your team to achieve a greater sense of productivity and insight into how methodologies and systems really work. Software development is a field of collaboration where everyone should be contributing to the pursuit of knowledge. There’s nothing in the reading that can really be disagreed with unless you are not truly meant for, or passionate, about the field of software development. The idea of creating your own curriculum might frustrate some people as it alludes to bringing your work home with you, however, in an ever-changing field such as this, self study is completely necessary. This is probably the most important chapter because it points to the idea that if you do not possess the inner motivation to study new material on your own terms, you may not be cut out for the job.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Shawn In Tech by Shawn Budzinski and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Hello, this is my first post for my Software Quality Assur & Test Course (CS-443). I’ll be making posts related to this course in the upcoming weeks.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Shawn In Tech by Shawn Budzinski and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.