Summary:

This pattern is based on newer programmers that have not had as much experience in the field not having reference to earlier works that were instrumental in the development of the field of software development. The newer programmer will have less reference in understanding the context of how things are the way that they are in the industry, and will be surpassed by his colleagues who know the literature and understand laws and phrases used.

What I find most useful about the studying of classics in a field like software development is emphasis on trends of the industry. Programming languages and projects can come and go, but if classic literature can be used regardless of the time period that is read it implies that there is general education that can be done that transcends simple programming or development.

This apprenticeship pattern has somewhat changed the way that I think. I know that I would probably have to learn terminology that is important to software development, especially when working with teams. This apprenticeship pattern has, at the very least, made me more interested about learning classical literature in the field. Although on the other hand, it seems a bit difficult to me to disambiguate which type of classical book to read, and which type to not read. The pattern references “When you pick up a book and the first thing you wonder is how out of date it is, you’re reading the wrong kind of books”, but I’m not entirely sure how to come to that conclusion. Although I’m assuming that I can gain proper reference via an article.

I do disagree with this pattern a little bit. Studying a lot of classical literature seems to me like a dedication that can take a lot of time and energy. I think if I want to expand my education on classical matters such as Brooke’s Law, it may be more beneficial to read a second hand source that aggregates classical laws and their contexts rather than reading some of the classics cover to cover. While my view here might be ignorant since it is only based on this short pattern, it is the impression that I get from it.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This apprenticeship pattern deals with the practice of working in real-world projects that may be rigorous, frustrating, or exhausting such that it makes the Apprentice question his motivations in the field. There may also be employment issues, bad leadership, or bad co-workers. Whether this programmer hates the job but desires a good income, is in a hiatus for his love of the field, or works on open source projects for a reputation.

One of my greatest fears in my career is a lack of interest in what I’m required to do. If I work at a company that shifts my work into something that I have no interest in or is very different, I run a real risk of burning out. Although, my favorite element of Computer Science and of programming stems from a certain love of creating things, a type that is not universally palpable in different fields. Hence, even though I don’t have a lot of peculiar interest in, say, creating a website, I’d do it if I need to and I’d probably enjoy doing it. 

I don’t agree or disagree with the action recommended in this apprenticeship pattern, however I feel as though more could be done in a situation like this. On top of writing the things that motivate you, you should try to think to yourself why you are motivated by the things that motivate you, and what is the common connection between all of them that acts as the catalyst. It may be that your motivations are either inconsistent or are the way they are for the wrong reasons. Shifting motivations to be more realistic or to make them fit more appropriately for a given situation can be very useful. On the other hand, if you’re in an untenable situation where you may become burnt out, forcing yourself to be in that situation while attempting to justify it may be harmful.

This apprenticeship pattern has at least caused me to be more aware of a situation that I may be befallen to in my future career. It may be better to move projects or companies if I’m in a situation where I may be burnt out working on something that I don’t like, whereas I could take some initiative and move to where I feel I’d be better suited.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This apprenticeship pattern concerns the long term journey that a programmer / developer will take throughout his or her lifetime. In a society that continuously values decadence, it’s important to find a path that is right for you, no matter how weird or seemingly unusual it may be. As we gain experience as programmers and developers, there will be temptation to mindlessly progress down the path of greater income and short term gain. Instead, this pattern is for those who aspire to progress down a fruitful path in software development, gaining experience in a lifelong career.

What I find most thought provoking about this pattern is the prospect of leaving the field of programming permanently to go down another field of salesmanship or to a high ranking position in a corporation. Software development to me is a very intricate and professional field that requires a lot of research, experience, and experimentation. Someone who progresses far enough into the field only for them to change directions because of their experience seems somewhat confused to me. On the other hand, it at least makes some sense as someone who has a lot of experience in software development can have a lot more skill as a business owner or a salesman in selling software, and recognizing development cycles for a product.

This pattern has indeed somewhat caused me to change my view of my future. I knew that within the software profession there were many different ways that one could go, and that we would need to be experienced with different tools if we needed to create a competent product. I wasn’t sure, however, of the potential of an opportunity arising to shift to a different career

I generally agree with this pattern. The part I agree the most is on the matter of strange roles that one may possibly find himself in in the future. Personally, my work and perspective on planning my future took a drastic turn almost a year ago, where I actively tried to search for a career as a programmer based on the tools that I already knew. Then, I found out that it’s better to learn and gain experience with new things that I don’t know, based on the demands of a job and the industry.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This pattern arises when a programmer is aloof by deeper concepts of a topic, even based on one that he may know, such as a programming language. One of the best ways to solve this issue is digging deep by reading books constantly. Books can offer a huge amount of information about one or more topics, and should be prioritized over blogs as a main source of knowledge.

Branching from the “Unleashed Your Enthusiasm” pattern, this pattern is one of the most important I’ve come across. Even if you are enthusiastic about learning, or are proficient in a skill and or a programming language, the ability to sit down and read to grow your knowledge is what I believe to be the most important skill and behavior. Even someone that is not enthusiastic, or does not know a language, or does not know a tool, if he can make himself sit down and read to learn more about a topic, he has far greater potential than he who doesn’t read.

As such, I strongly agree with this pattern. It also is a strong reminder for me to start reading more, and I tend to not read books to learn more. While I strongly agree with this pattern, I also want to add a note that does not run contradictory to it. Sometimes not reading and getting familiar with something is also beneficial. Reading is extremely important, but getting an intuitive understanding of a tool, like driving a car, is also an important task that should be done concurrently to reading constantly.

As I’ve mentioned before, I am competent with the C++ programming language, and I’m able to use it confidently without having to constantly look things up online or in a book. However, this pattern has me thinking about what I should start reading. One of the things I understand the least of in C++ are Move Semantics. Move Semantics involve utilizing rvalues and rvalue references to avoid creating unnecessary copies of an instance. An rvalue tends to be an immutable value that tends to be on the right of an assignment operator, such as an equal sign (hence rvalue). How this works aloofs me, and I believe this can be a good starting point for me to begin my habit of reading books since I understand the context of its existence.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This apprenticeship pattern is concerned with a new developer’s entrance in a team that is both more experienced, and relatively unenthusiastic in comparison. As a newcomer, the new developer has much to learn from the industry and from his colleagues. But with every new iteration begins a chance at change. Depending on the team, enthusiasm can benefit a team that does not have low morale, and is accepting of new perspectives.

I view this apprenticeship pattern as particularly intriguing because I am genuinely enthusiastic about working on a team with other software developers. Someone who is inexperienced in a field may focus and develop skills in things that his future peers will not require. As such, it may offer a perspective that his peers do not have, such as various coding “tricks” or knowledge that may be used as a reference. For example, a new programmer may have to program an algorithm from scratch in school, which can give him ideas about a data structure that a team may either require, or benefit from. In the field, programming a data structure isn’t as important since the language would likely offer it. 

This pattern didn’t so much cause me to change my ways of thinking as it did bolster my perspective of the field. In my experience, it is natural for someone who is good at something in a field to gradually become uninterested in said field because of a sort of coexistence. There is some mental functionality or process in every person that occurs when someone becomes used to something, such as an environment or a smell, which causes him to become somewhat apathetic. In this case, a developer that is used to the field runs a genuine risk of being used to it, and therefore, not excited from it. I personally view unenthusiasm is a strong indication of decline, and any person who becomes unenthusiastic will, all else being equal, perform poorer than his peers.

I don’t disagree with anything in this pattern. As stated earlier, I strongly agree with the role that enthusiasm plays in relation with other team members, and its potential productive results that can benefit a team.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This apprenticeship pattern is concerned with a lack of familiar tools that a programmer has on his belt. It’s recommended that the apprentice become very skilled at five tools such that he does not need to read the documentation while also understanding the nooks and crannies of them. As time goes on, and he moves from job to job or project to project, become sufficiently familiar with the tools he learned. This does not mean that an apprentice that is good with these tools means it will be good for others or for the team.

This pattern is similar to the “Your first language” apprenticeship pattern, which states that it’s good to master your first language before moving on to a second language. I like this apprenticeship pattern because of its ideal of mastering and recording the tools that one learns. I also like the idea of trying to find better and more powerful tools available whilst the apprentice writes down the tools he is already familiar with. 

The pattern has somewhat changed my view on my intended profession. However, I don’t have a hardline goal about what my intended profession looks like, I’m completely fine with bending my skills and attitudes based on what my employer wants me to do, and what is required of me. If my team at a future company requires me to learn a new system that I’ve never used before, then that’s what I’ll do. Likewise, if they require me to use what I already know, then I’m also completely fine doing that as well. 

I’m not entirely sure if I fully agree with the fact that all of the tools that an apprentice will learn and be familiar with will become obsolete by the time he becomes a journeyman. What if a student / apprentice becomes very familiar with Java and eventually becomes employed as a software developer who utilizes Java? I know as time goes on, tools change and languages become favored or disfavored as the development landscape changes, but I am having a hard time agreeing with this statement. I know that a lot of different apprentices can have many different skills, many of which can me more useful than others, especially when taking into account what type of work they’ll likely be employed in.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Summary:

This apprenticeship pattern deals with a software developer that cannot afford to learn by failure. This software developer may work at a company that must get things correct, and thus cannot experiment and learn from his mistakes. Thus, this pattern recommends the developer to create his version of his work’s program in private, to experiment so he can learn.

I want to say off the bat that I do not disagree with anything stated in this pattern. In fact, the most I’ve learned has been from practicing and failing repeatedly, so I strongly believe that this is a very important pattern for all developers.

This pattern has helped me greatly in my understanding of development. For example, in one of my homework assignments that required me to implement an algorithm that sorts operating system “jobs” by time to process, I wanted to use what is called a “MultiMap”, that is to say, a Hash Map that allows duplicate keys that could then be sorted, by key or by value. After this assignment, I spent hours trying to figure out its implementation, and I eventually figured it out. By following this pattern, I was able to figure out more about Java types, and I taught myself how to use hashing algorithms. 

I find this apprenticeship pattern very interesting. I bring the above example up because what I find interesting about this apprenticeship pattern is that I never thought to apply it to my work projects. There is a lot of information that I’m learning about when I’m working outside of school, and this pattern has indeed changed the way I think about how I will work and what my profession will steer me towards, and vice versa. 

I will try to create a private project with homework or work in which I implement the project differently, and try to see if I come up with any valuable results. There are many things I’ve learned from applying this principle to a few homework assignments or free time projects, but I can feel that this would be very beneficial in trying this with new systems, or alternate pre-existing ones from school or work.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Chris's CS Blog by Chris and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.