When you first get placed on a team, it’s sometimes hard to get your bearings if you aren’t given an explicit task to work on to begin with. We sort of experienced this at the start of the semester, where we weren’t all too familiar with the Thea’s Pantry project even after working with forks of it for assignments in prior courses. Part of this is just the nature of working with something new, and having the expectation of providing value to it in a practical sense.

In this way, it makes sense the way we approached the issues that we took for the first sprint. For the most part, these issues were fairly simple and mostly plumbing, which can also be classified as sweeping the floor. The idea for sweeping the floor is that you take simple tasks that, while necessary, aren’t all that interesting, in order to build confidence in yourself with the project and build rapport with the team.

The authors make a good point in that it might not feel great to do as someone with a Computer Science degree that you worked hard for, but the reality is that the degree is really just a way to get your foot in the door. Same with any other way that you gained the qualifications to get accepted for a job or project that you’re working on. The real work is the work you do when you’re placed into a project, where you really get to apply the basics that you learned in college while also learning more practical skills.

I really think this is a good approach to take when you feel out of your element in a new environment. Maybe you just got hired for your first internship or even first full-time job, and while you are excited, you don’t really know how to actually provide value to the project, because you haven’t necessarily had that sort of experience before. This seems really helpful to get your bearings in a new project. The authors do mention a couple drawbacks to this approach, with the most notable one being the feeling of being stuck doing the small tasks without branching out due to anxiety, but there are ways out of this mindset too.

From the blog CS@Worcester – V's CompSCi Blog by V and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This week I decided to discuss the pattern called “Stay in the Trenches”. In this section, the problem presented is where you are offered a promotion into a role that will pull you away from programming. It mentions that this offer is an illusion of accomplishment that will test your sustainable motivation and determination to walk the long road.  I decided to pick this pattern because it involves the idea of sustainable motivations which is a pattern I wrote about previously. I am unsure about what is motivating me to stay in the field so I like thinking about these kinds of topics. I don’t think this section has really changed my mind about the way I think about my profession though.

Many people equate a promotion with success but in the problem presented (a promotion that would pull you away from programming), you will be trading the programming skills that you have worked to develop for said promotion. The tet calls for you to stay on your path and work with your manager to find other mechanisms to reward you for your excellent work. This means if your company refuses to be flexible, you should find opportunities somewhere else. 

I agree that it would be best to continue on the path of software engineering since you’ve dedicated a lot of time in an attempt to become a master but simply saying that if your organization is inflexible then you should find opportunities elsewhere is a bit easier said than done. I think you can love this path but if life knocks you down it may be a bit difficult to stay on the path. If you are able to find other opportunities, that’s great; you can continue on the path. If you have trouble finding other opportunities and you need the resources that the promotion can provide, then you may just have to take that promotion. I’m not saying that you have to give up software engineering forever, but you might have to take a little detour and stray from the path a little at least until you can find other opportunities elsewhere. You can still love software engineering and pick up projects in your free time but sometimes you have to be realistic in this society career wise. 

Lastly, I do think the list of possible alternate rewards for your excellence was great. It suggested to “consider whether there are standard constraints that could be loosened in your case” and to  “prepare a list of these alternative rewards so that when you reject that promotion, you’re in a position to negotiate based on a clear understanding of your own motivations”. I think those are very helpful suggestions.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Live Laugh Code by Shamarah Ramirez and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

The “Be the Worst” pattern advises individuals to seek out environments where they are not the most skilled or knowledgeable. Instead of always aiming to be the best, this pattern encourages embracing discomfort and challenges that come with being the least skilled person in the room. By immersing oneself in such environments, individuals can experience accelerated growth, learning, and personal development.

The “Be the Worst” pattern has profoundly impacted my perspective on professional growth and skill development. It challenged me to rethink the notion of always striving to be the best and instead highlighted the immense value in stepping into situations where I may feel inadequate or outmatched.

What resonated with me the most about this pattern is its emphasis on humility, openness to learning, and the willingness to embrace discomfort. It acknowledges that growth often occurs outside of one’s comfort zone and that being the least skilled person in a group can be a powerful catalyst for improvement.

This pattern has caused a significant shift in how I approach my intended profession as a software developer. Instead of seeking validation from being the best, I now prioritize seeking environments where I can learn the most, even if it means initially feeling uncomfortable or challenged.

One aspect that I found particularly thought-provoking about this pattern is its recognition of the importance of humility in learning. It encourages individuals to set aside their ego and embrace the learning process fully, regardless of their current skill level.

While I wholeheartedly agree with the premise of the “Be the Worst” pattern, I also recognize the importance of finding a balance. It’s essential to have supportive environments where one can leverage their strengths while still being pushed to grow and improve.

“Be the Worst” pattern has inspired me to embrace challenges, seek out learning opportunities, and approach skill development with a mindset of continuous improvement. It has reshaped my perspective on professional growth, emphasizing the value of discomfort and humility in the journey towards mastery.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Hieu Tran Blog by Trung Hiếu and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

In a world where promotions often signal success, it’s crucial to consider whether ascending the corporate ladder aligns with your true passions. George Leonard, in his book “Mastery,” cautions against succumbing to the allure of quick-fixes, urging us to stay committed to our craft despite the tempting promises of managerial roles.

Summary of the Pattern

“Stay in the Trenches” challenges the conventional notion that climbing the organizational ladder is the only path to success. It emphasizes the importance of remaining immersed in the technical aspects of your profession, particularly in software development, rather than transitioning into managerial roles prematurely. By prioritizing hands-on experience and continuous learning, individuals can sustain their passion for their craft and avoid the erosion of their expertise.

Reaction to the Pattern

This pattern resonates deeply with me as a software developer. It underscores the significance of staying true to one’s passion for programming, even in the face of enticing promotions. The idea that mastery diminishes when one veers away from practice serves as a powerful reminder of the value of continuous engagement with technical challenges.

The pattern prompts me to reconsider traditional notions of career advancement and success within my profession. It encourages a shift in perspective towards recognizing the intrinsic satisfaction derived from honing in on one’s skills, rather than solely pursuing external markers of achievement.

Furthermore, “Stay in the Trenches” has prompted me to reflect on the role of leadership and influence within technical domains. It highlights the potential for experienced practitioners to advocate for environments that facilitate ongoing learning and growth, not just for themselves but for their colleagues as well.

Disagreements with the Pattern

While I largely agree with the principles outlined in this pattern, I acknowledge the complexity of navigating career trajectories within different organizational contexts. While staying in the trenches may be an ideal scenario for some, it may not always be feasible or conducive to professional growth in every situation. In some organizations, the pathways for technical advancement may be limited, and promotions into management roles may be unavoidable for those seeking career progression. Additionally, the pattern’s emphasis on rejecting promotions may not align with everyone’s career aspirations or financial needs.

In conclusion, “Stay in the Trenches” serves as an important reminder of the importance of nurturing one’s passion for software development amidst the attraction of managerial positions. By prioritizing technical excellence and continuous learning, individuals can navigate their career paths with intentionality and authenticity, ultimately fostering a deeper sense of fulfillment in their professional challenges.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Site Title by rkaranja1002 and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Concrete Skills

For this post, I read about the Concrete Skills pattern. This pattern is about when seeking a new role on a development team, the team may not want to risk the possibility that one may you be able to contribute to the team. They may think this because you may not have much concrete work to show your skillset and prove to teams you are able to contribute. The solution to this problem according to the text, is to acquire and maintain concrete skills. In order to do this, the text suggests collecting CVs of people whose skills you respect. Collecting CVs helps give an idea to what skills are useful and looked for when joining these teams. After learning these skills, then build a project using them to demonstrate that you can apply those newly learned skills.

I found this pattern to be useful because I am currently in the process of applying to jobs, so this pattern is very prevalent to me. Collecting CVs of those already in the industry, or those with more experience is something I had not thought of. However I believe it is a good way to find skills that you may be missing. Collecting a list of skills is also useful in the sense that common buzzwords used among CVs can be noted to help get past HR filters and managers who construct teams based off of those buzzwords.

I found the statement that describes hiring managers requiring to take a leap of faith on choosing who they hire, and having concrete work allows you to meet them halfway to be interesting. I found this to be interesting because it changes my perspective on the hiring process.

This pattern has changed the way I go about looking for new skills to learn. When learning new skills, I sometimes plateau and get overwhelmed with what I should be looking into. Now after reading this pattern, going into the future I will start collecting CVs because having a list of skills will be useful to direct my focus in the skills I should be learning.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Zack's CS Blog by ztram1 and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

The pattern being examined is “Learn How to Fail” and it emphasizes the inevitability of failure in everyone’s life. It also suggests that failure is not a sign of incompetence but rather an opportunity for growth and self-awareness. This encourages individuals to analyze their failures, understand the underlying patterns, and address them effectively without dwelling on past mistakes or striving for perfection.

This pattern resonates deeply with me due to the universal nature of failure and brings light to the fact it is a natural part of the learning process. I am one that values continuous self-improvement and find the idea of embracing failure as a catalyst for personal growth both empowering and liberating. Instead of viewing failure as inadequate, it is seen as an invaluable source of feedback that can inform my future decisions and actions.

One of the more interesting and useful aspects of this pattern is its emphasis on self-reflection and self-awareness. The pattern provides a practical framework for introspection and self-discovery by encouraging individuals to identify recurring patterns, habits, and behaviors that contribute to their failures. This will help individuals to make more informed choices and develop strategies to lessen their weaknesses effectively.

This pattern has certainly influenced the way I think about my intended profession and how I approach my work. Failure is now viewed as an opportunity for learning and development rather than a setback or source of shame. I intend to face challenges and setbacks during my career path and handle them with resilience, knowing that they will contribute to my overall growth and success.

While I do not disagree with the general message of this pattern, there can be cause for concern given how you might handle failure. It is important to acknowledge and learn from failure, it is just as important to celebrate successes and achievements. Failure can provide valuable lessons but can also overshadow or diminish one’s accomplishments in the search of self-improvement. Balancing both self-reflection and self-affirmation is crucial for maintaining a healthy mindset and sustained motivation.

In conclusion, the pattern underscores the importance of embracing failure as a steppingstone to personal and professional growth. By cultivating self-awareness, learning from mistakes, and approaching challenges with resilience, individuals can navigate their professional journeys with confidence and adaptability.

5. Perpetual Learning | Apprenticeship Patterns (oreilly.com)

From the blog CS@Worcester – Jason Lee Computer Science Blog by jlee3811 and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

The ‘Find Your Mentors’ pattern is about the idea of “apprenticing” yourself to someone who is more experienced than you are within your field of expertise. While this pattern should be considered for many different professions it should especially be considered for software development as having a mentor can be very helpful especially when you are trying to find your place in the huge world of software. One of the main ideas attached to this pattern is that you will have the realization that you are not the first person to start out being a software developer with little experience professionally as everyone that is currently in the field had to start at the same spot you are currently at and their knowledge can be beneficial to you in order to shape your own career and practices. The solution provided for this pattern is finding a master craftsmen in order to be supervised by them and have the proposed master shape your understanding of the field and your career, but it is also said that with computer science being a relatively ‘young’ field it is hard to find a true master as their are not many people that have ‘mastered’ all of computer science but that there are many people who may have mastered parts of computer science and you should seek out different people in order to increase your understanding of what each mentor you obtain has mastered in their time in the field.

I feel as though this pattern is very important because computer science is younger than many other fields and mentors can be hard to come by in fields which have many ‘masters’ nevermind fields which have very few like computer science. Explaining that it is ok and completely acceptable for a software developer to have many mentors throughout their professional journey in the different disciplines of computer science helps students such as myself realize that you can continue to explore further and further into the field without having to necessarily pick a specific discipline and settle to work on only that discipline for our entire careers but instead that we should feel encouraged to gain more knowledge as knowledge on other disciplines can help us to gain understanding within whichever discipline we are currently working within.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Dylan Brown Computer Science by dylanbrowncs and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

https://www.practitest.com/resource-center/article/black-box-vs-white-box-testing/#:~:text=The%20Black%20Box%20Test%20is,is%20carried%20out%20by%20tester.

Black box testing is a genre of testing which does not take a codes functionality into consideration, in other words the internal workings of the code are not known to the test and the tests are formed strictly by external workings. This is very different from white box testing as white box testing operates under the idea that the ‘tester’ has extensive knowledge of how a system was created along with its inner workings. Some of the differences between black and white box testing are black box testing is carried out by ‘tester’ while white box testing is left to software developers, black box testing is considered behavior testing while white box testing is considered logic testing and black box testing is typically used in system testing while white box testing is used in unit testing. There are also ways in which these two types of testing are similar which is mainly their purpose which is to ensure that a system is working correctly and that you have the best version of the software available.

I chose this article because I liked how it not only explained black box testing but it also compares black box testing to white box testing in order to allow a deeper understanding of the relationship between the two types of testing. I am very interested in seeing how different methods of black box testing work as for the most part we have been practicing with white box testing methods in class so far this semester so the concept of testing without extensive knowledge of a system or without access to the systems internal workings and code seems both interesting and challenging to me. 

With there being a large gap in knowledge of a system between the two different types of testing it seems as though black box testing is something that is done by others not necessarily full blown software developers as developers are expected to spend their time on white box testing so It makes me wonder how exactly these tests are written and how specific results may be measured for success compared to the more straightforward nature of white box testing. Since black box testing can be used for just about every type of testing, even some of the sames types of testing white box is used for it would be nice to see and compare how tests are carried out for both types of testing on a similar component of a system in order to differentiate the information used by each type.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Dylan Brown Computer Science by dylanbrowncs and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.