Code linting, which provides automated tests to ensure that code complies with established standards and best practices, is an essential step in modern software development. Linting has a significant impact on the entire development process by improving maintainability, reducing errors, and increasing code quality. The TechTarget publication “Understanding code linting techniques and tools” presents a comprehensive introduction to code linting. It describes linting, discusses several linting approaches, and provides examples of typical linting tools. The essay underlines how linting can provide uniform coding standards across teams and discover errors early in the development process. It also emphasizes the importance of incorporating linting into pipelines for continuous integration and delivery, or CI/CD. Linting is an important part of ensuring high-quality software development, which is why I selected this resource. It is also directly related to the subjects covered in CS-348. The importance of clean, maintainable code and automated methods for software quality assurance is highlighted throughout the course. Furthermore, understanding linting is critical to my professional development as a software engineer, particularly as I try to improve my teamwork and coding practices. The article taught me more about linting, particularly how it helps to maintain consistency across a codebase and spot errors early on. Linting, I discovered, does more than merely check syntax; it also enforces code standards and detects potential problems at runtime. Tools like Pylint for Python and ESLint for JavaScript, for example, can detect obsolete functions, unused variables, and other minor issues that might otherwise go undetected. One of the most important lessons learnt was how to include linting tools into CI/CD processes. This integration significantly reduces the risk of production defects by ensuring that code is automatically examined for flaws before being merged into the main branch. Furthermore, the site introduced me to a variety of well-known linting tools, each tailored to a specific language and use case, such as ESLint, Stylelint, and SonarLint. The research emphasized the need of following coding conventions, particularly when working on collective projects. In my experience, inconsistencies in coding styles have hindered progress and caused confusion. A linting tool may have alleviated these issues by requiring consistency throughout the team. Going forward, I aim to incorporate linting into my development process. I’ll start my personal efforts by looking into language-specific tools like Pylint for Python and ESLint for JavaScript. I will encourage the usage of linting tools in team settings to improve code quality and speed up the review process. To ensure that the tools match the team’s needs, I want to explore creating linters to adhere to project-specific standards. Another key priority is to incorporate linting into CI/CD pipelines. By doing so, I can reduce the chance of problems in production circumstances by ensuring that the code meets quality criteria before deployment. In addition to enhancing my output, these strategies will provide me with the necessary abilities to succeed in professional software development settings.

Works Cited:
TechTarget. (n.d.). Understanding code linting techniques and tools. Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchsoftwarequality/tip/Understanding-code-linting-techniques-and-tools

From the blog CS@Worcester – Just A Girl in STEM by Joy Kimani and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

When looking
around the internet, I found that there was waterfall 2.0 version of the
waterfall software development methodology that we learned at start of class. After
I saw the article, I found out that even the most established practices can
transform to meet the demands of new era. Therefore, I chose this article as it
provides basic summarization of waterfall 2.0 and the difference between
traditional waterfall model. As we talked about why waterfall method was being
replaced by agile and scrum, I thought there will be some people who will try
to improve and use the old working method so using this article showed me how
waterfall transformed to adopt need of current workflow. Therefore, I decided
to look into it as a background for finding out about the improved version as
it revives the dying method into a new form.

             This
article uses baking as an example to illustrate the principles of waterfall 2.0.
It describes the steps on planning, mixing, baking, decorating and enjoying trying
to explain how they work. For example, for planning, allowing adjustments to the
cake showing adaptability, mixing; showing collaboration with others, baking;
showing continuous monitoring, making sure the cake does not burn or become too
dry etc. This shows how the 2.0 fixed many problems of waterfall. In the end,
these changes try to solve the problem of traditional waterfall model that was
not able to adopt to constantly changing environment and unexpected changes to
the requirements and need of the program.

             Reading
this article reminded me why the waterfall model is being replaced by agile or
scrum, not able to meet the industry’s demand in changing environment. Using
cake to explain the new waterfall made the concept more understandable and memorable.
The example clearly showed what the 2.0 version tries to do in order to survive.
The concept of Waterfall 2.0 was particularly impactful because it demonstrated
that no methodology is entirely outdated. If they have the right adjustments,
even traditional approaches can remain relevant in the changing world. In the
future, I thought I might use waterfall methodology in a short and brief project
that what I had to do was very clear. However, finding out waterfall 2.0 I can
try to use it for future project. For example, it could be useful in projects
with fixed deadlines and regulatory requirements, where a hybrid approach
ensures adaptability and flexibility.

Link https://de.celoxis.com/article/waterfall-is-dead-long-live-waterfall-2-0

From the blog Sung Jin's CS Devlopemnt Blog by Unknown and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.