This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

This is my final blog for the university, where I work hard for four years, hoping to become a software developer. The team and I finished most of the tasks for the project “Reporting. System”; it was challenging for our learning experience. There are struggles and realizations from mistakes and trials of multiple attempts that help and benefit understanding for further the learning experiences. Those learning experiences from the tasks were interesting and challenging to complete becoming more difficult than others for unexpected.

I am currently making a presentation and adding details from looking back at the tasks that the group and myself for how much we accomplished. Also, looking forward to graduation. After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. I have done these issues over the semester for weight assignments that have been changed with a total weight of 2-3 is reasonable and practicable. Some are easy to do and understand, but others are challenging.

The Issue:

• Remove MongoID leftover – Backend (changes). There are still MongoIDs available, and I will investigate this further. After I asked for feedback or assisted in making certain adjustments, the result seemed to be an improvement, and the team concurred.
• backend — Write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes tests in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working).

My still challenge concerning one of these tasks is researching the topic of “Chai.” the topic is still questioning the existence of a library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It provides that your code continues to work as intended by attaching to the assertions set up. Like npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases.

After I got the chai working correctly, I learned the backend server kept shutting down due to missing files, leading to some codes not passing. The team and I backed up the system by going back to find those files and running for testing; the first half is working (the version number), and the second half won’t. (missing data from the database). 

For improvement, I prepare to find information about this issue from my group members and others by asking others who have had this experience issue before. Even though the team and myself ran into more mixed technical problems during the development process, like missing files, which resulted in more delays that shifted the focus on the specific problem. Even that problem can help us better comprehend and learn new specialties to avoid misleading and repeated attempts. 

In conclusion, in the third and last university sprint, our team had a good time discussing and executing the tasks, though we tried to do some things to perform wildly well after the second-Sprint. We still faced some obstacles that became a fun learning experience for new topics.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Hello, welcome to the Second-Sprint Retrospective Blog. I contributed to the group project by working on the tasks assigned on GitLab. I chose to complete one of the jobs, but it was more difficult than I had expected. I am currently participating in an activity that calls for additional alterations, and adding more details is more complicated than I had anticipated. It is up to the team and me to decide whether to put the modifications for the necessary measures. 

After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. Completing this ISSUE Weight assignment with a total weight of 3 is reasonable and practicable. 

The Issue:
backend — write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes test in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working). 

My challenge concerning these works is researching the topic of “Chai.” It explains that Chai is an assertion library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It allows maintenance of your code’s functionality and checks that it follows those assertions. It has the “assertions” style comparable to Node.js’s built-in assert module, and the “expect” style uses a chainable API to create more legible and expressive tests. Chai can be used with any testing framework, including Mocha, to define test suites with a specific feature. Each test in a test suite will state how your code should act.
I learned that it has additional chai-related dependencies after researching the topic. These include additions to npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases. However, the conjunction of some codes didn’t pass due to some missing information and led to some failures. 

To improve myself, I plan to seek information regarding this kind of assignment from members of my group and members of other groups by asking questions. It will serve as a learning experience. Even though the end of the year is getting close, I have seen that my abilities to manage time have increased, and the learning steps for work are becoming the assigned time. We ran into various technical issues during the development process, which resulted in delays; the team and I had a fantastic mid-round in finishing all of the items listed on the sprint backlog. These delays are different learning experiences that require better comprehension and learning new specialties to avoid those misconceptions and repeated attempts resulting from communication breakdowns. The problems may avoid by increasing knowledge and diving into the serious issue with the other group collaborating. 

In conclusion, in the second sprint, our team had good objectives and executed them, though we succeeded wildly better after the First-Sprint. We overcame some obstacles and learned about new topics while working through the complex pipeline and completing one of the assignments.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Hello, welcome to the Second-Sprint Retrospective Blog. I contributed to the group project by working on the tasks assigned on GitLab. I chose to complete one of the jobs, but it was more difficult than I had expected. I am currently participating in an activity that calls for additional alterations, and adding more details is more complicated than I had anticipated. It is up to the team and me to decide whether to put the modifications for the necessary measures. 

After the team and I adjusted to the issue board required for the work and practice. Completing this ISSUE Weight assignment with a total weight of 3 is reasonable and practicable. 

The Issue:
backend — write a test suite for API (changes); This activity writes test in Chai, ensuring that the backend works with the API while ensuring you get a file back in .xls format (get the simple tests working). 

My challenge concerning these works is researching the topic of “Chai.” It explains that Chai is an assertion library written in JavaScript with different test frameworks. It allows maintenance of your code’s functionality and checks that it follows those assertions. It has the “assertions” style comparable to Node.js’s built-in assert module, and the “expect” style uses a chainable API to create more legible and expressive tests. Chai can be used with any testing framework, including Mocha, to define test suites with a specific feature. Each test in a test suite will state how your code should act.
I learned that it has additional chai-related dependencies after researching the topic. These include additions to npm install chai, chai-HTTP, chai-as-promise, etc. Those additions make the process simpler, but it doesn’t look good. It has already gone through the potentially functional aspects, even after the review, code addition/construction, and code comparison phases. However, the conjunction of some codes didn’t pass due to some missing information and led to some failures. 

To improve myself, I plan to seek information regarding this kind of assignment from members of my group and members of other groups by asking questions. It will serve as a learning experience. Even though the end of the year is getting close, I have seen that my abilities to manage time have increased, and the learning steps for work are becoming the assigned time. We ran into various technical issues during the development process, which resulted in delays; the team and I had a fantastic mid-round in finishing all of the items listed on the sprint backlog. These delays are different learning experiences that require better comprehension and learning new specialties to avoid those misconceptions and repeated attempts resulting from communication breakdowns. The problems may avoid by increasing knowledge and diving into the serious issue with the other group collaborating. 

In conclusion, in the second sprint, our team had good objectives and executed them, though we succeeded wildly better after the First-Sprint. We overcame some obstacles and learned about new topics while working through the complex pipeline and completing one of the assignments.

From the blog Andrew Lam’s little blog by Andrew Lam and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.