Category Archives: Quarter-1

Blog 1 – How to manage and improve software processing.

Improving your software processing is crucial, especially when working on a group project, managing time pressure, and leading a team, among other responsibilities. Here is a great resource that I found invaluable for beginners and interns. “https://axify.io/blog/software-process-improvement“

According to Pierre Gilbert, a software delivery expert, he highlighted the “7 steps” to implement software process improvement, or SPI. I will break down those steps to get a better understanding.

Step 1: Make the problem visible – Use historical data to show where delays, defects, process inefficiencies are happening

Step 2: Get the Team’s Buy in – Don’t just impose changes. Use data to show why improvements are needed so your team member see the value.

Step 3: Track essential metrics – Use DORA metrics + value stream mapping to find bottlenecks

However, this step still gets me confusing, so feel free to checkout the link to have a better understanding.

Step 4: See where improvements would be most effective – Prioritize high-impact areas rather than trying to change everything at once.

Step 5: Make a plan – Clear responsibilities; tools; define which existing processes are targeted; pilot projects before roll-out; ensure feedback loops.

Step 6: Implement the plan – Execute carefully; monitor; allow for adjustment; don’t force changes that slow things down without justification; use continuous feedback.

Step 7: Adjust as needed – SPI is never “done” – measure progress via KPIs, adapt if cultural or resource issues arise, keep refining.

After reading those steps, I can’t imagine the environment of software engineering is not as simple as I thought. Understanding the steps could help me preparing of what’s coming next.

Before improving SPI, we need to understand the common challenges people usually face when it comes to working on project.

Time pressure – in high-pressure environments, it’s easy to prioritize delivery over process improvement.

Poor management or lack of ownership – improvements can be fragmented without clear responsibility

Team maturity – less mature teams may struggle with discipline & consistent adoption.

Overall, reading this could help you get ahead of what’s upcoming in the software engineering environment. For further information, check out the link above.

#CS-348, #SPI

From the blog CS@Worcester – Nguyen Technique by Nguyen Vuong and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Understanding Git Collaboration: Communities, Upstreaming, and Merge Conflicts

Hello everyone! Welcome back to my blog posts. Today I would be delivering my first Quarter blog post.

For this week’s blog, I decided to read “Git Forks and Upstreams: How-to and a cool tip” from Atlassian Git Tutorials. I picked this article because it connects directly with what we’ve been practicing in class—working locally, pushing changes upstream, staying synchronized, and handling merge conflicts. I also wanted a guide that explained the actual Git commands rather than just high-level concepts, since I’ve been moving away from relying only on graphical interfaces.

Summary of the Resource

The article explains the difference between origin (your fork) and upstream (the original repository you forked from). It walks through how to set up your fork so you can keep it synchronized with the upstream repo, which is especially important when multiple people are contributing. Commands like git remote add upstream <url>, git fetch upstream, and git merge upstream/main are introduced step by step. The tutorial also shares a useful tip for checking how many commits your branch is ahead or behind the upstream, which makes it easier to stay in sync.

Why I Chose This Resource

I chose this article because it fills a gap in my own Git knowledge. Until recently, I mainly used the graphical interface on the side to commit, push, and sync my changes. That worked for basic assignments, but I often felt like I didn’t really understand what was happening behind the scenes. This tutorial helped me connect the dots by showing me the exact commands and explaining why they matter, especially in collaborative projects.

Reflection and Takeaways

This resource helped me see Git as more than just a tool for saving code. it’s really about teamwork. Understanding how to add and pull from upstream makes me feel much more prepared to collaborate on group projects or open-source contributions. I no longer see merge conflicts as something to fear, but as a natural part of multiple people working on the same code.

One big realization for me was how important it is to stay synchronized with upstream. In one project I did before, I once ignored updates for too long, and the merge that followed was messy and stressful. Now I understand that frequent git fetch upstream and git merge calls prevent bigger problems down the road.

Another personal shift was moving away from the GUI. While the interface made Git feel easier at first, I see now that the terminal gives me more power and clarity. Running git status, git log, or checking how far ahead/behind my branch is compared to upstream makes me feel more in control. It’s like going from driving an automatic car to learning manual, I finally understand how things actually work under the hood.

Looking ahead, I know these lessons will help me not only in this class but also in internships and my future career. Whether I’m working on an open-source project or contributing to a company’s codebase, being comfortable with upstream workflows and conflict resolution will make me a stronger and more reliable teammate.

Citation / Link

From the blog CS@Worcester – Rick’s Software Journal by RickDjouwe1 and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Improving Design Communication with PlantUML

Improving Design Communication with PlantUML
I guess when it comes to software engineering, code is usually the arbiter of truth, although it isn’t always the best avenue for communicating a design for your average person/laymen considering developers and computers can parse through lines of code like it’s nothing- but trying to understand the higher-level structure or interactions within a system can be somewhat challenging without some kind of abstraction to it, which is why UML diagrams have a great deal of utility to them as they strip-away the low-level implementation details that the layperson in question doesn’t have to deal with- allowing us to focus on the essential interactions.

Why I chose this?

So for this week’s professional development blog, i decided to go with this resource regarding UML diagrams(https://miro.com/diagramming/what-is-plantuml/#what-is-plantuml) considering we’ve been working on this in class for the better part of a few class days now. While syntax is important, I wanted a resource that went beyond the basics and emphasized best practices — specifically, how to make diagrams more readable and effective as communication tools. Which ties back to what we were doing for the classwork activity, the learning objectives of the activity we did in-class together includes identifying parts of UML diagrams, being able to connect them to Java implementation or even being able to draw the diagrams using Markdown with PlantUML.

What did I learn?
The article did help me with solidifying my understanding of the lifelines, the messages and the activation bars within the UML sequence diagrams, but in general from the article, i learned how PlantUML treats diagrams as code: by writing simple text scripts, you can generate UML diagrams consistently and efficiently. This can help out somewhat in collaborative environments, where diagrams kind of have to evolve along with the codebase. The section on best practices i think i find the most interesting since the article highlights that diagrams should focus on clarity over completeness.

For example, a UML sequence diagram should emphasize the key messages between objects rather than every small detail. The guide also pointed out how to use colors, notes, and layout to improve readability — some things that you don’t really pay too much attention to(at least for myself) so them giving pointers on how to use those things is good in case we want to make things look more pretty or neat-looking. I do appreciate the explanation of how PlantUML integrates with version control systems although it’s not something i found particularly too significant. Since diagrams are stored as text, they can be tracked and managed in Git just like source code. This makes them much easier to update collaboratively if need be, compared to traditional tools where diagrams are static images.

Reflection and Application?

At first i thought it might be something i’d forget about in a month or two(if i’m being just honest with the article), i do think it helped with reinforcing the core concept that the UML designs aren’t just academic exercises that we were doing in class, but it can be a practical tool for teams collaborating with each other compared to the traditional tools where it’s like the diagrams are just static images alongside the fact that it isn’t just checking a box but being able to make sure everyone understands, between the code and the people. I guess i’d say for any future projects that come to mind, i’ll apply what i’ve learned by keeping my diagrams somewhat simple and try to make it with an audience in mind since there will be people i’ll interact with and get feedback when it comes to my PlantUML code. I also wouldn’t mind experimenting with Markdown and Git so that the diagrams can evolve with the codebase, becoming almost like living documents as opposed to a static artifact.

From the blog CS@Worcester – CSTips by Jamaal Gedeon and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.