Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

   Last week I started diving into the perpetual learning section of the
Apprenticeship patterns book, beginning with the expand your bandwidth
section. I talked about how I want to learn more about my field and explore
new discoveries in the industry. This time however I read up on the “Break
Your Toys” section from the book. This section covers the need to fail in
order to improve, and how to set up an environment where you can sort of
fail on purpose.

I am no stranger to failing and struggling when it comes to computer
programming, as I am sure we all are familiar with it. This section makes a
case for using a pet project, or a “toy program” as they put it, to test and
break to your heart’s content. This is supposed to allow you an environment
in which to practice whatever programming you desire, and most importantly
an environment to fail in. Failure in your job usually leads to you losing
the respect of your peers at best, or losing your job at worst. This is not
an environment where you can make mistakes comfortably, and mistakes are
necessary for growth. 

So basically the section is telling us to make a side project where we can
mess up all we want, and learn from it. Pretty basic advice, but it can go a
long way to making you a better programmer. In fact, it is a piece of advice
I have already implemented in other parts of my life. As a hobby, I build
and paint plastic miniatures, and use them in tabletop games. Recently I
have become much more focused on improving my painting skills. As a result,
I have taken up several side projects where I can experiment with different
painting techniques. I even keep around spare models to use as test
subjects. Not all of these projects pan as I would like them to, but that is
part of what makes them appealing to me. It allows me to fool around and try
new things, without the risk of failure being an impediment. Back in the
book they suggest maintaining a wiki as a way to practice without worry.
Personally, I am thinking of fooling around in some game engines as a way to
practice.

From the blog CS@Worcester Alejandro Professional Blog by amontesdeoca and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

Link to blog: https://www.computer.org/publications/tech-news/trends/application-security-testing

The whole semester we have been exploring various ways of testing code, namely styles that ensure the code works as it should. However, there is another aspect of testing we have not discussed yet; security testing. 

It is of the utmost importance to ensure that your software, database, website, etc. is safe from hackers and leaks. Security testing would help just that: making sure your system is unbreakable, or at the very least mostly protected from vulnerabilities and flaws. I think it is important to learn about this aspect of testing, which is how I came across Adam Stead’s article What is Security Testing? How to Check The Security Strength of Your Application.

Stead stresses the importance of security in software and also lists some important security testing techniques, such as vulnerability testing, black box testing, penetration testing, and more. There are many benefits of security testing besides identifying vulnerabilities. Some examples listed by Stead include protecting sensitive data, enhancing customer trust, and cost-effectiveness. Data leaks have been pretty common as of the past several years and it is a huge deal for those companies to lose their customers’ trust and their own reputation. With increased security comes increased trust, which is beneficial to both the business and the customer. 

Stead mentions some security testing best practices, and reinforces the idea of starting early and prioritizing risks. Security testing early on in development can help prevent flaws in your code, and you should continue to test throughout production. Prioritizing risks ensures that your important flaws don’t go unnoticed, and you fix your biggest holes before fixing the smaller ones.

Stead ends the article by discussing some attributes of effective security testing (thoroughness, continuity, scalability, etc.) and stresses the importance of checking the security strength of your software regularly.

I selected this article because this is a topic we have not discussed much in class even though it is still a very important part of software testing. This article emphasizes the key elements of security testing and how important it is to include it as a part of your testing regime.

The content of the resource was very informative and understandable for someone who already has a bit of understanding of software testing. An interesting thing I learned was about fax online, which is a method that businesses use to securely send documents. I did somewhat enjoy the article, it was informative, however I wish it included some examples of certain testing types. I expect to apply my newfound security knowledge to future jobs and software practices.

From the blog CS@Worcester – Josh's Coding Journey by joshuafife and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.