LeonardoMariano823

> I am using Linked-in to keep up with my professional contacts and help them with introductions. Since you're among the people I suggest, I wanted to invite you to gain access to my system o-n LinkedIn. > > Basic account is free, and it takes less when compared to a second to register and join my system. I've received more than 3-5 announcements similar to this, worded almost exactly the same way. The senders have acted surprise... Like me, have you ever received email announcements like these? > I'm using Linked-in to keep up with my professional connections and support them with introductions. Because you're one of the people I recommend, I wanted to ask you to gain access to my system o-n Linked-in. > > Basic account is free, and it takes less than a minute to sign up and join my community. I've received above 35 invitations similar to this, phrased almost precisely the same way. The senders have acted offended and surprised that I did not jump to reap the benefits of this invitation. Let's consider the dilemmas in this invitation from the marketing perspective. * The vast majority of the invitations I received were from people whose names I did not identify. Why would I wish to be part of their network? The request does not say how I would benefit from their system and who they are, who they have use of. * What's Linked In, how can it work and what are the advantages of using it? No body has yet explained this clearly within their request. You can't expect that someone receiving this request knows what you are asking them to join or how it would be good for them. It would be beneficial to have a sentence or two describing how it works and mentioning a specific effect anyone behind the request enjoyed from membership. It may be that people think that since 'basic membership is free,' the typical person of this request will go-ahead and join. But even if it can not charge money, time would be taken by joining. You still need to 'sell' people o-n going for a free action, particularly with respect to an activity or organization which may be unfamiliar to them. * Nobody took time to head off possible misconceptions or objections to the membership. As I am anxious that joining would open me up to a large amount of email and calls where I'd have no interest and that would waste my time, a non-member of Linked-in. Again, you can't suppose that some thing free is therefore enticing; you need to imagine why some body may have questions or dismiss the theory and handle these objections. * Using a processed request that's almost the same as everyone else's doesn't make a great impression. Click this webpage Hartman Journal  CaringBridge to read where to engage in it. Even when the text provided by Linked In were powerful, which it is not, you'd want to give it your individual stamp. Navigating To tablemother32 - StreetFire Member in US seemingly provides lessons you might give to your pastor. Aside from being irritated that they are obviously encouraging visitors to send invitations that make little sense, I've nothing against Linked In. Perhaps it is a helpful business. Navigating To linkedin.com/pub/angel-recalde/41/41a/55 likely provides aids you might use with your co-worker. My position is that its members need to use common sense and fundamental marketing axioms to encourage busy, suspicious people-to give it a chance..