Scrum is a widely-adopted framework in software development that is designed to encourage collaboration, smart time usage, adaptability, and transparency to deliver high-quality results to customers. The methodology centers around three roles: Scrum Master, Product Owner, and the Development Team.  Each role is critical to ensuring the scrum process is effective. Together, they uphold Scrum’s core values: commitment, focus, openness, respect, and courage.

The Roles in Scrum

1. Scrum Master:
   The Scrum Master serves as the facilitator and coach, ensuring that the team will follow the Scrum principles. They steer the team away from distractions, help remove obstacles along the way, and guide the team toward self-organization and improvement. Their role is not necessarily  about managing the team but empowering it to achieve its goals effectively.
2. Product Owner:
   The Product Owner is the voice of the customer, responsible for “maximizing” the product’s potential and value. They manage the product backlog, prioritize features based on the current sprint, and provide clear requirements to the team. They act as the bridge between stakeholders and the development team, ensuring that there is a complete alignment on goals and expectations.
3. Development Team:
   The development team consists of software development professionals who collaborate to deliver increments of the product during each sprint. They are self-organizing, meaning they decide how to accomplish their tasks without intervention from the Scrum aster or product owner. This is great for fostering ownership, accountability, and for delivering high-quality work.

The Values of Scrum

Scrum is mostly made up of  five key values that the team’s behavior and decision making:

• Commitment: Teams dedicate themselves to achieving sprint goals and delivering value.
• Focus: By working on a limited set of tasks at a time, teams maintain clarity and productivity.
• Openness: Transparent communication fosters trust and ensures that challenges are addressed collaboratively.
• Respect: Team members value each other’s contributions and expertise, creating a positive and supportive work environment.
• Courage: Teams take bold steps to innovate and tackle tough problems.

Why Scrum Matters

Scrum’s structured yet flexible approach enhances collaboration, reduces waste, and drives continuous improvement. By empowering teams to adapt to change and deliver incrementally, organizations can respond more effectively to customer needs and market shifts. Whether done in software development, marketing, or other fields, Scrum’s roles and values provide an amazing foundation for the success of a company.

Resource on Scrum Management

“What is Scrum in Project Management?” is an informative video about the Scrum methodology by the work management company Wrike.  This resource informatively explains all aspects of scrum, including but not limited to: goals, roles, practices, and examples.  It also explains the idea of a “sprint” which is the current goals of the development team that they must get done before the next sprint.  Check out the video for more information on Scrum Methodology.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M12HSYZkrgQ

From the blog CS@Worcester – Elliot Benoit's Blog by Elliot Benoit and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

One of the incredibly positive aspects of the software development community is the general spirit of collaboration. This is particularly true within the open source software community. Paired with the fact that anyone can maintain a project/portfolio on GitHub, there is a lot of code out there. I would argue that this is a good […]

From the blog CS@Worcester – CurrentlyCompiling by currentlycompiling and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

We have discussed REST APIs in class and are learning to use them with a practical, hands-on approach. This approach is faster for the course and is better for my understanding of the material, but I thought it would be a good idea to learn the history of REST APIs and expand my general knowledge of the subject. I found The Postman Team’s blog post, “What Is a REST API? Examples, Uses, and Challenges,” which discusses the fundamentals of REST APIs, including their history, standards, functionality, uses, benefits, and challenges.

The blog starts by explaining how REST APIs evolved from a simpler alternative to SOAP APIs, becoming the backbone of the modern web. With the advances in the internet during the early 2000s, developers and companies needed to be adaptable, which SOAP API was not the tool for. The post expands on the disadvantages of SOAP APIs and explains why they were less valuable at the time. SOAP APIs were not scalable and too restrictive, making it difficult for developers to innovate. REST APIs, on the other hand, gave companies and developers the flexibility and scalability needed to keep up with the internet as it evolved. Another key feature it had was independence. REST APIs are not tied to a platform or language and have client-server separation. The adaptability and simplicity made REST APIs an obvious choice for companies like eBay and Amazon.

The post also discusses some of the challenges involved with REST APIs. Some include maintaining consistent endpoints, managing multiple versions, and dealing with differing authentication methods. All these issues complicate the development and maintenance of REST APIs which is why there are standards used to mitigate problems in the future.

The blog’s final section showed REST API examples, including Amazon S3, Twitter, Instagram, and Plaid. It explained how each API has its own specialization, like Twitter’s registration process or Amazon’s ability for developers to incorporate AI.

What I found most interesting about the blog post was the timeline for REST APIs’ evolution, the big names that pushed REST APIs forward, and the reasons behind their actions. Major companies we know today, like eBay and Amazon, got ahead of the curve, leading the way for companies like Twitter and Facebook. Learning the reason behind its success and its practical uses was interesting. I will use what I’ve learned to approach future projects with a stronger understanding of REST APIs, ensuring I design scalable, adaptable, and efficient code.

Blog: https://blog.postman.com/rest-api-examples/

From the blog CS@Worcester – KindlCoding by jkindl and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

In the world of software development, effective version control and collaboration is very important. Two prominent platforms facilitating these needs are GitLab and GitHub. The article “Difference Between GitLab and GitHub” from GeeksforGeeks offers a comprehensive comparison of these platforms, highlighting their unique features and differences.

The GeeksforGeeks article delves into the distinctions between GitLab and GitHub, focusing on aspects such as:

• Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitLab provides built-in CI/CD capabilities, enabling seamless automation of the software development lifecycle. In contrast, GitHub requires third-party integrations to achieve similar functionality.
• Self-Hosting Options: GitLab offers a free community edition that supports self-hosting, granting users full control over their repositories. Conversely, GitHub self-hosting is available only through its paid enterprise version.
• User Permissions and Collaboration: GitLab’s free version allows for more extensive user permissions, including role-based access controls and protected branches in private repositories. GitHub imposes more restrictions in its free tier, such as limiting protected branches to public repositories and capping the number of collaborators in private repositories.

I chose this article because it provides a clear and concise comparison of GitLab and GitHub, two platforms integral to modern software development. Understanding their differences is crucial for developers and teams aiming to select a tool that aligns with their workflow and project requirements. I also chose this article because we use both platforms in class. In the beginning of the semester, if someone was to ask me what the main difference is between GitLab and GitHub. I would not be able to tell them.

The article enhanced my understanding of the operational variances between GitLab and GitHub. I learned that GitLab’s integrated CI/CD pipelines can streamline development processes by reducing reliance on external tools. This integration allows a more cohesive environment for managing code changes, testing, and deployment.

Additionally, the flexibility of self-hosting with GitLab’s free community edition offers significant advantages for organizations concerned with data privacy and security. It allows for greater control over the development environment without incurring additional costs.

The article also shed light on the importance of user permissions in collaborative projects. GitLab’s comprehensive role-based access controls in its free version facilitate better management of team contributions and code integrity. In contrast, GitHub’s restrictions in its free tier may pose challenges for larger teams or projects requiring stringent access controls.

Recognizing the importance of these platforms in the industry, I am committed to deepening my proficiency with both GitLab and GitHub. I plan to engage with comprehensive tutorials and hands-on projects to master their functionalities. By dedicating time to explore and practice with these platforms, I aim to position myself as a proficient user, ready to contribute effectively in professional settings where these tools are integral. This proactive approach will not only enhance my technical skills but also increase my employability in a competitive job market.

Sources:
Difference Between GitLab and GitHub

Citation:

“Difference between GitLab and Github.” GeeksforGeeks, GeeksforGeeks, 23 July 2024, http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-gitlab-and-github/. 

From the blog CS@Worcester – CodedBear by donna abayon and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

I will admit, learning Git is…unpleasant? A headache? Baffling? Rage-inducing? I, for one, do not enjoy trying to untangle the mess when Git goes off the rails. In fact, I have on a few different occasions decided that it would be more worth my time to redo all my work for a project/assignment than spending […]

From the blog CS@Worcester – CurrentlyCompiling by currentlycompiling and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

The first time I was taught about ‘Smells’ in code it was in connection Robert C. Martin’s “Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices“. For those who have not read it, starting from Rigidity we have Fragility, Immobility, Viscosity, Needless Complexity, Needless Repetition, and Opacity. All of these are categories of red flags in code, they are problematic because over time they make the code “hard to understand, modify, and maintain”. In an earlier post of mine, I talked about design patterns which are proven solutions to common coding problems. So when I saw an article talking about smells that can come from these design patterns I was intrigued. This eventually lead me to find out that the Singleton design pattern specifically is considered by many to be never good to use.

In an article titled “Examining the Pros and Cons of the Singleton Design Pattern“, Alex Mitchell first explains how the goal of the singleton design pattern is to “ensure a class has only one instance, and provide a global point of access to it.” He then goes on to list the pros, which, for those who do not know or remember, are; it insures only one instance exists throughout the code, it allows for that one instance to be called globally, and it limits access to that instance. Then he gets to the cons, first of which is it violates the single responsibility principle. Next up is the pattern’s tight coupling followed by how it complicates testing and finished with it obscuring dependencies. He then offers an alternative to singeltons in the form of Monostate or dependency injections and then a nice conclusion to wrap it up.

Lets go in order for the cons. Con #1: on a second look this seems obvious, the singleton class is simultaneously controlling its creation and managing access to itself. Con #2: again on second blush its because there only being one instance of the object means you cant use polymorphism or alternate implementations. Con #3: you cannot test in isolation since a singleton persists globally across tests. Con #4: the dependencies are not explicit when the singleton is used. The Monostate pattern allows for multiple instances to exist while having the same logical state, so while config1 and config2 can both change configValue, getting configValue from either config1 or config2 would return the same value. Dependency injection is, as far as I understand it, passing the singleton into the class that uses it, so rather than referencing the singleton it just has the singleton inside the class.

From this article I have come to a better understanding of dependency injection and will probably be using this framework in my future code since apparently a lot of code still uses the singleton pattern and dependency injection seems to best handle existing singletons.

Link:
https://expertbeacon.com/examining-the-pros-and-cons-of-the-singleton-design-pattern/

From the blog CS@Worcester – Coder's First Steps by amoulton2 and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.

In software development, code smells are subtle yet significant indicators of potential problems within a codebase. Much like how an unpleasant odor hints at deeper issues, code smells signal areas in the code that might lead to bigger challenges if left unaddressed. The article linked below is exploration of this concept, highlighting the importance of […]

From the blog CS@Worcester – CurrentlyCompiling by currentlycompiling and used with permission of the author. All other rights reserved by the author.